·

　　I'm Sasha. I'll answer.

　　The drone hits the tank, provided that the drone can take off.

　　I don't know if you have noticed that in this Russian-Ukrainian war, Russia hardly used helicopter gunships.

　　Why is this happening?

　　Mainly Ukraine is equipped with a large number of portable stinger air defense missiles provided by the West. This thing is a great threat to Wu Zhi, and even if Russia has air superiority, it can't put an end to these anti-aircraft firepower.

　　If Russia basically controls the air superiority in the theater, Wuzhi can't fight effectively, let alone drones.

　　UAV is essentially a large model airplane, and only a few UAVs have weak air combat capability.

　　The vast majority of UAVs are only used for reconnaissance and ground attack, so the use of UAVs must master absolute air superiority, and can clear most of the field and even portable air defense weapons on the ground.

　　Why did China's drones fly at a low altitude at first, and then managed to raise the altitude?

　　For example, the cruising altitude of Pterosaur 1 is 5000 meters, while the maximum flying altitude of Pterosaur 1D is increased to 8500 meters.

　　Why do you want to improve so much?

　　For example, the British portable air defense missile Starlight has an operational altitude of 5,000 meters. Pterosaur flying at an altitude of 5000 meters is not safe and can be shot down by the enemy alone.

　　In fact, the height of 8500 meters is not enough.

　　For example, China's short-range air defense missile Hongqi 17AE has a shooting height of 10 kilometers, that is, 10,000 meters. Pterosaur 1D is still under the threat of field air defense. And Red Flag 17 can fight by bicycle, and it can be searched by its own radar. You can't prevent it and it is difficult to destroy it all.

　　It is an inevitable phenomenon why China's drones sell well in the Middle East, but they are often shot down.

　　Any kind of UAV will have a certain loss rate even under the complete control of air superiority.

　　Then the question is, if the enemy completely grasps the air superiority, it will be difficult for your drone to take off and use.

　　If you have completely mastered the air superiority, is it necessary to use a large number of drones? Isn't it more efficient for fighters, bombers, attack planes and even Wu Zhi to attack?

　　The bomb load of pterosaur 1D UAV has increased from 100 kg of pterosaur 1 to 400 kg, but it is only 400 kg.

　　Not to mention the advanced, let's take a look at the backward top 5 attack aircraft, with a bomb load of 1500 kg.

　　Drones are very important, but they have not completely become the protagonists of the battlefield.

　　With the progress of science and technology, drones will gradually occupy the sky.

　　The advantages of drones and tanks PK are indeed obvious. But if you imagine, what will it face if some blind man fights China with a drone? There are all kinds of satellites in space, such as early warning aircraft, reconnaissance planes, electronic jammers, fighter planes, bombers, unmanned aerial vehicles, etc. The ground is densely covered with all kinds of radars, infrared/photoelectric reconnaissance systems, electronic jamming systems, acoustic and photoelectric jamming systems, and tanks are accompanied by armored vehicles, self-propelled anti-aircraft guns, shoulder-mounted air defense missiles, armed helicopters, Hongqi 6, Hongqi 7 and Hongqi 12 field air defense missiles. Red Flag 9, Red Flag 15, Red Flag 22, S300 and S400 long-range air defense/anti-missile missiles form a combat system that covers long-range, medium-range, short-range, high-range, medium-range and low-range, gives consideration to both soft and hard killing, and has both offensive and defensive capabilities. In the face of this system, the advantages of the so-called drones playing tanks are gone.

　　Our satellites can monitor the whole world 24 hours a day. If there is a war, the war zone will be the focus of attention. At least dozens of satellites are staring at your head at all times. Early warning aircraft and reconnaissance planes in the air, and various radar, microwave, photoelectric and infrared reconnaissance systems on the ground monitor the battlefield 24 hours a day. Except for the equipment on duty, all other services and arms and posts are ready for combat at the first level 24 hours a day. As soon as your drone was dispatched, I found it here, and then I mobilized all kinds of combat forces to hit you. If you have already taken off, we can send fighters to intercept you, shoot you down with anti-aircraft missiles, and use electronic jamming equipment to interfere with your navigation system and flight control system with computer viruses, making you deaf and blind. Even your lair, we can smash it with long-range ballistic missiles, cruise missiles, air-to-ground missiles and so on. At this time, what are the advantages of the so-called drones playing tanks? Maybe you were shot down without even seeing my tank.

　　In previous wars, tanks were strangled by air power, and they were unable to fight back, because the combat systems of both sides were not in the same standard, and the combat theories and concepts of both sides were not in the same standard. For example, in the Gulf War, the operational concept of the Iraqi army remained in the mechanized period, and weapons and equipment were intensively applied on a large scale. What he doesn't know is that the multinational forces led by the United States have entered the era of information warfare. At this time, assembling personnel and equipment on a large scale is the enemy's best target. Moreover, when Iraq invaded Kuwait, it offended all neighboring countries and all the big countries in the world, and it was very isolated in the situation, and there was no one to support it. In the operational system, the Iraqi army is also incomplete. It has no satellites in space and lacks effective battlefield monitoring means, so it is not surprising that it was beaten to pieces. In the Kosovo war, the United States, Britain and other countries did not want to overthrow the regime of Yugoslavia, nor did they want to seize the land of Yugoslavia. They just wanted the Yugoslav army to accept its own conditions and withdraw from Kosovo. If you are unwilling to withdraw from the Federal Republic of Yugoslavia, I will send air power to bomb you until you agree. The Yugoslav army is also incomplete in its combat system. There is no space power, no early warning aircraft, and only old-fashioned radar can detect enemy targets. Of course, the camouflage of the Yugoslav army is still good. Although the U.S. military claimed to have destroyed many tanks, armored vehicles and other targets in Yugoslavia during the Kosovo War, it was only when Yugoslavia finally accepted American conditions and withdrew its troops from Kosovo that the United States discovered that,The losses suffered by the ground troops of the Federal Republic of Yugoslavia are very small. As for the subsequent wars in Iraq, Afghanistan, Libya and Syria, they were all wars in which adults fought children, and the combat forces and systems of the two sides were completely different. Yemen's civil war is a bit the other way around. The Gulf Coalition forces headed by Saudi Arabia, equipped with weapons and equipment of various advanced powers, were defeated in the face of Yemen's Houthi armed forces. China's Rainbow 3/4/5, Pterosaur 1/2 Chada integrated UAV, American F15 fighter, M1A2 main battle tank, AH64 Apache helicopter gunship, German Leopard 2 main battle tank and so on all left Maicheng. As for the conflict between Armenia and Azerbaijan, Armenian tanks were defeated by Turkish TB2 drones equipped by Azerbaijan with Israeli-made patrol missiles, because Armenia had no decent air defense force at all.

　　Drones play tanks very well, mainly at 3 o'clock.

　　1. The tank side is a small country, without accompanying air defense system and jamming system;

　　2. The tank side is a small country, without all kinds of composite armor, active defense, or even the top grid installed in Russia;

　　3. The tank side is a small country, and there is no long-range fire to attack the other side's airport.

　　In addition, you only saw drones hitting tanks fiercely, but you didn't see drones hitting infantry more fiercely. Not only drones, but most weapons hit infantry fiercely. If you are at the front line, you are definitely more willing to be a tank soldier.

　　Funny, no one does not admit that drones are fierce, but you don't understand the importance of tanks and system operations. You may not know at a young age that when the anti-tank missiles first came out, the Middle East war was fought beautifully, and the Israeli armored brigade under the sublime world was frightened out of my wits by a group of Egyptian infantry "fire box" anti-tank missiles, and it was almost wiped out in attack force (not the whole brigade). At that time, not only military fans, but also military experts in most national systems thought that the end of tanks had arrived. The theory of tank uselessness is rampant, and many big countries, including China, have slowed down the pace of research and development of new tanks. However, in the subsequent local wars, although anti-tank missiles became more and more advanced, and tank killers like Wu Zhi appeared, tanks still played a huge and irreplaceable role, which proved that their position was unshakable. The theory of tank uselessness gradually died down, and no one mentioned it again. Even if drones make waves today, no military expert will say that the end of tanks is coming ...... This is first because tanks are irreplaceable as the three most balanced marine weapons for fire protection and maneuvering, and second, tanks can rely on the system to fight against anti-tank weapons. These are the lessons learned by military experts, and they are also the lessons learned by old military fans. Speaking of air threats, manned fighter planes, whether attack planes or helicopter gunships, have higher performance and efficiency than active drones, pose a greater threat to tanks, and fail to shake their status. As for drones, they are nothing more than a new threat, and they can't shake the status of tanks at all.Anti-tank missiles, weapons, terminal-sensitive bombs, laser-guided artillery shells ... There are many tank killers, and I don't care about one more drone. Think deeply, why can't a man-machine shake the position of a tank? In addition to the irreplaceable tank itself, the modern air defense system and air force can effectively deal with the air threat of manned aircraft. Why do drones make a splash? There are two main reasons: first, the country that was beaten by drones does not have a strong air force and a perfect air defense system. The second is the air defense system for the development of manned aircraft, which is not suitable for some drones and cannot be effectively countered. Needless to say, the former, as far as the latter is concerned, the existing air defense system is mainly aimed at high-value and high-speed manned targets, while some drones are too slow to be detected by the moving target display system of the old radar, and a large number of cheap drones and patrol missiles are enough to exceed the fire channel of the existing air defense system, forming a saturated blow. But doesn't it mean that drones have been invincible all over the world? No way. The invisible problem can be solved by modifying the radar detection system or lowering the threshold of moving target display. By developing and perfecting the new air defense system, we can solve the problem that we can't fight. With the popularity of drones, the development of anti-UAV weapons in various countries is also in full swing. Various electronic jamming systems, laser weapons, microwave weapons, small-caliber cannon and improved individual missiles have been introduced one after another. The adjustment of air defense system will eventually erase the temporary advantages of UAV and achieve a new balance between attack and defense. And the position of the tank as the core weapon in land war. In the foreseeable future, it will not change.Unless new weapons completely change the rules of engagement and the improvement of the existing system can't cope with it. Obviously, at present, the drone does not have this weight.

　　In short, the problem of drones is not that the old army fans are too old, but that the new army fans are too young and lack knowledge and experience ...

　　Supplement: Recently, the United States launched the concept car of the next-generation main battle tank, abrams X, and then CCTV hinted that China's next-generation main battle tank will be the strongest in the future. In addition, Amata T14 launched by Russia before, China, the United States and Russia, which are also the top three in the world's military power, have launched the fourth-generation tank, and the fourth-generation main battle tank-KF51 "Panther" launched by Rheinmetall of Germany. In addition, in addition to these innovative tanks, France and Germany jointly developed EMBT "Enhanced Main Battle Tank", which focuses on urban warfare, based on the body of leclerc and the turret of Leopard 2A7. This series of developments is undoubtedly a loud slap in the face against the useless theory of tanks!

　　Abrams X.

　　Black Panther

　　Panther built-in drone

　　Amata

　　Imagination of China's future tank users

　　"The strongest surface in the future", so stay tuned.

　　First, all military powers have drones. This is not a new toy.

　　Second, drones are no match for manned aircraft, and drones are only abused in front of high-speed fighters. Drones are cheaper than helicopters to deal with tanks.

　　Third, in the face of countries with strong air defense capabilities, there are basically not many drones that can escape the net. What can drones do in front of the "trinity" combination of fighters, air defense missiles and anti-aircraft guns?

　　Fourth, some people see drones abusing tanks. Do you try to abuse Israeli tanks? Weaker military countries are inherently lacking in protection, and often one or two new toys can toss them, but a strong military country is a systematic war, and people have no shortcomings.

　　Fifth, military powers such as Israel need drones, tanks and fighter planes. Do you have drones that can beat other people's fighter planes, tanks, drones, self-propelled artillery and anti-aircraft missiles? Even in China, do you think drones can escape China's barrage?